Expectation monitoring for automated work.

Catch successful runs that miss the expected result.

Glnc catches the quiet failure: your automation reports success, but the expected result does not happen.

Beta access is opening gradually. Already have an account? Sign in

Example expectation

Catch the quiet failure

Not live
Automation Status
  • Nightly backup

    Passing

    Completed on time
  • Daily report

    Warning

    Running later than usual
  • Catalog sync

    Failing

    Run #1842 Reported OK

    Observed
    12
    Expected
    ≥ 50

The sync reported success, but created only 12 of the 50 expected records.

Frequently asked questions

Expectation monitoring, answered.

  1. What is expectation monitoring for automated work?

    Expectation monitoring checks whether recurring automated work produced the expected result, not only whether its process ran. In Glnc, a Check combines a schedule with optional output rules, and Runs report status and metadata so missing, late, failed, slow, or unmet output becomes visible.

    Read the expectation monitoring guide
  2. How can I tell whether a cron job ran but produced the wrong output?

    Have the cron job report Run status and output metadata to a scheduled Glnc Check. An output rule compares the reported value with the expected threshold, so a succeeded Run can still show a warning or failing status when the output is wrong.

    Follow the cron output guide
  3. What is the difference between heartbeat monitoring and expectation monitoring?

    A heartbeat shows that a process checked in within an expected window. Expectation monitoring can also evaluate completion, duration, and reported output, so use it when a timely check-in may still hide an incomplete, slow, or low-output result.

    Compare heartbeats and expectations
  4. How should I monitor the outcome of an automation, not just whether it ran?

    Keep the existing scheduler or automation platform, then report Run status and metadata to Glnc. Define rules for a useful result, such as a record count or artifact flag, so Glnc evaluates the outcome after execution rather than whether the process merely ran.

    Learn about automation outcomes
  5. What tools support output expectations for automated jobs?

    Glnc supports latest-run and windowed output rules over reported Run metadata. Rules compare values with equality or numeric operators; windowed rules can evaluate an average, sum, minimum, maximum, or count across a trailing period.

    Explore output expectations
  6. How can an agent define a check and report a run to Glnc?

    With a full-access API key, an agent POSTs the complete Check configuration, including its name, to create it. It PUTs the complete configuration to update an existing Check, then POSTs each Run with result, a stable report_id, and observational evidence. Account-level monitoring requests do not use X-Entity.

    Read the API reference

Why existing monitors miss it

A run can report success and still leave the work undone.

Cron jobs, Zapier and Make scenarios, custom scripts, AI agents, webhook-driven pipelines — each one can finish, report success, and still not produce the expected business result.

  1. Uptime monitoring asks

    Is the endpoint available?

  2. Job monitoring asks

    Did the process run?

  3. Glnc asks

    Did the expected outcome happen — even when the run itself reports success?

How it works

Send the result. Know if it met expectations.

  1. Define the result you expect.

  2. Send the result when the automation runs.

  3. See whether the work met the expectation.

Private beta

Define what should be true. Know when it isn't.

Join the beta and monitor your first expected result.

Glnc uses essential storage for the app. Optional analytics stay off unless you allow them.